WARNING:
The content of this blog has not been approved by the Obama administration and is deemed by the Department of Homeland Security to be a 'rightwing extremist' website.
Showing posts with label Media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Media. Show all posts

Sunday, November 1, 2009

FNS Interview with Rush Limbaugh

It is not often than Limbaugh grants an in depth interview. It's pretty rare. On today's Fox News Sunday, Rush gave one of the best interviews that I have seen him do. If you missed it, here it is.



The White House wasted no time in responding to the Limbaugh interview via David 'the commie' Axelrod on Face the Nation

Saturday, October 17, 2009

How the Left is Actually Helping the Right


One would have to be living in the wilderness for the last several months in order to be unaware of the war that the left is waging against certain conservatives. The White House has declared war on Fox News Channel. MSNBC continually goes after Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, and Coulter as if they were the 'axis of evil', as do the liberals throughout the blogosphere.

It seems that the more the left decries their enemies the more popular they become. Despite the efforts of the White House to paint Fox News as a primary source of disinformation, and something other than a legitimate news outlet, Fox's ratings continue to climb.

Fox News' Glenn Beck show, which only began airing on January 19th of this year, now draws more viewers than all three of the competing time slot shows on CNN, MSNBC, and HLN.

While negative press typically has a correspondingly negative effect on popularity, that is not always the case. There are many instances in which negative publicity can have a positive effect on popularity. Many times negative publicity, such as a musician who has gotten into trouble with the law, has an indirect relationship to their currently marketed work, in such cases, negative publicity can increase sales. In other instances in which it is the product or service which is the subject of the negative publicity, such as a book or movie review, sales would be adversely effected.

Since this is generally the case, and since the negative press is directly attacking these conservative commentators products and services, why isn't the negative publicity negatively effecting their popularity? Well, it may have to do with risk. Negative advertising used against a politician works because their is risk involved in ignoring such advertising. The same is true with a product or service, the consumer risks his money, and in some cases, his safety, by ignoring the negative publicity. However, in the case of negative publicity against conservatives, the consumer need only risk a little time, usually at his discretion and leisure, to verify (or dismiss) the negative claims which the left presents against conservative commentators and Fox News.

So, if Rachel Maddow says that Glenn Beck is exploiting the tragedy of 9/11, or if Keith Olbermann attacks Glenn Beck for his part in bringing about the resignation of Van Jones, the public risks relatively nothing in deciding for themselves if such claims are accurate. And there in is the rub, because the public is obviously doing that, and are concluding that the negative publicity is substantively wanting. In the final analysis, it all boils down to credibility.

It seems to this observer, that the liberals are actually helping conservatives to get our message out, and while that is certainly their intent, we are nonetheless, very appreciative of their assistance.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Yep, Just Another Indoctrination Video


Fox News Channel is airing a new video of school children at a PTA meeting chanting the praises of the Obama administration. This is even a little more creepy than the one that came to light last week. While the children do not mention Obama's name specifically, there is no doubt about the allegiance of those who organized this performance.







MSNBC's Norah O'Donnell and liberal bloggers are defending these demonstrations of adoration and allegiance with the 'what's the big deal' defense. But, the left knows what the 'big deal' is. They know that this is indoctrination, and that is precisely why they are fine with it. All modern day tyrannical regimes use the public school system to promote and perpetuate loyalty, and most deny it. Adolf Hitler however, was quite open about it.

"When an opponent declares, 'I will not come over to your side, I calmly say, 'Your child belongs to us already... What are you? You will pass on. Your descendants, however, now stand in the new camp. In a short time they will know nothing else but this new community.' " - Adolf Hitler, Nov. 1933



I know the left is disgusted with these endless comparisons to Hitler and the Nazis. If the left really wishes for these comparisons to cease, it would really be helpful if the left would stop making these comparisons so easy to make.

Thursday, August 20, 2009

MSNBC is Color Blind?

On August 28, 1963, Martin Luther King gave his famous 'I Have a Dream' speech. The spirit of one of the most often quoted lines from this speech, has become one of the most ignored, at least by the American left.

"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

Occasionally however, the left leaning media demonstrates that they are capable of exercising actual color blindness. Well, sort of. When it suits the purpose of advancing the political agenda of the Democrat party, the MSM will engage in a lie of omission with respect to the ethnicity of some.

In 1996, University of California Regent Ward Connerly sponsored proposition 209 which amended the California state constitution to prohibit public institutions from considering race, sex, or ethnicity. The media in California ran stories focusing on the opposition to the measure and op-eds demonizing the proponents. The public was left with the distinct impression that prop. 209 was racist measure which would set minorities and women back decades. While carefully trying to shape public opinion against the measure, the media was equally careful not to publish any photos of the measure's sponsor, Ward Connerly.

The ruse was exposed when Jesse Jackson, who had come to California to lead the fight against 209, felt the need to offer a plausible explanation for his refusal to debate Connerly. Jackson explained that he did not wish young black men and women to become confused by the site of two black men debating the merits of affirmative action. Proposition 209 passed with 54% of the vote.

MSNBC attempted much the same deception on Tuesday. During the Morning Meeting program, Contessa Brewer ran a video clip which consisted of only of close up shots of the firearms being carried by a man at a pro-health care rally.






The video clip had been deliberately edited in such a way as to completely conceal the fact that the man in question was in fact an African American. Brewer said, "there are questions about whether this has racial overtones....white people showing up with guns." I imagine that the credibility of her words might have been diminished somewhat, if they had not edited the video.

During the segment, MSNBC pop culture analyst Toure argued: "...there is tremendous anger in this country about government, the way government seems to be taking over the country, anger about a black person being president....we see these hate groups rising up and this is definitely part of that."

I imagine that the man, whose identity is not known at this time, might not be to pleased with being colored (excuse the pun) as white, or of being associated with individuals who may be angry that a black person is President.

There is a reason why in a recent Basic Cable Network Rankings for prime time, Fox news is #2 and MSNBC is #24 out of 30 networks. I believe it is because when it comes to news, Americans have a preference for non-fiction.

Friday, March 20, 2009

MRC Honors Brit Hume

Last night Brit Hume was honored by the Media Research Center with the William F. Buckley Jr. Award for Media Excellence. He is only the third recipient of this prestigious award. The late Tony Snow was the recipient of the 2008 WFB Award. The first recipient was, of course, the host of the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, Rush Limbaugh in 2007. The award was presented by MRC President Brent Bozell.

Presenter



Recipient



Brit left Fox News just after the November elections for simi-retirement. At my house, if the television is on, it is generally tuned to the Fox News Channel. Tony Snow and Brit Hume at two of the best reasons that I got into that habit. I miss them both.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Andrea Mitchell Courageously Caves

In an interview today with Rep. Barney Frank, Andrea Mitchell accepted the blame, evidently on behalf of the media at large, for holding up Comrade Obama's cabinet appointments.



Many of George Bush's appointees waited the better part of eight long years for Senate confirmations which never came. Can you imagine any reporter, on any station, including Fox news caving to similar charges leveled by a Republican? It would not have happened!

After this unseemly display of abject cowardice, could any thinking person possibly believe that the mainstream press is unbiased.